The Impact of Open Source

I had certainly heard about “open courses” offered by a number of universities in the past, but had never taken the time to explore one of them before. This week, I looked through the courses available through the Open Yale courses program: http://oyc.yale.edu/   In particular, I looked at “PLSC 114: Introduction to Political Philosophy (Fall, 2006)” which can be found at: http://oyc.yale.edu/political-science/introduction-to-political-philosophy

Simonson et. al (2009) list a number of sets of best practices in course design for distance education. If we look at this Open Yale courses against the six criteria used to design the World Bank’s Global Development Learning Network, these “open courses” do not meet any of the criteria:

1.    They are based on clearly established learning needs and built around succinct statements of outcome.
- The Syllabus outlines what will be “taught”, but not outcomes.

2.    They are based on a variety of teaching and learning strategies and methods that are activity based….
- Teaching strategies include lectures and readings, no learning strategies are addressed.

3.    Effective distance learning materials are experiential… they address the learner’s life experience….
- Learners get the experience of listening to a lecture or reading – and participating in a survey at the end.

4.    Quality distance learning programs are participatory in that they emphasize the involvement of the learner in all facets of program development and delivery.
- This is where the course really falls short. The program is instructor centered, not learner centered.

5.    Successful distance learning programs are interactive and allow frequent opportunities for participants to engage in a dialogue with subject-matter experts and other learners.
- Absolutely no opportunity to engage in dialogue with the instructor, experts or other learners.

6.    Learner support systems are an integral part of any successful distance learning program.
- Learner support is essentially a FAQ page to assist with technical issues.

Are they really courses?

I’m not sure that it is fully appropriate to call these “courses”, as there is no opportunity for interaction available with the instructor, or others who may be participating in the course. The aim expressed on the Open Yale courses site is “to expand access to educational materials for all who wish to learn.” (Yale, 2011). Absolutely, this project has made materials available – but are materials on their own a “course”? Where is the interaction, the evaluation and the application of learning? If they are looked at purely as “resources”, they are excellent – but when judged as “courses” they fall short.

I couldn’t help but think of the line from the movie Good Will Hunting (1997). , “…you dropped a hundred and fifty grand on a ****** education you coulda' got for a dollar fifty in late charges at the public library”.  I remember thinking when I heard that line the first time that dear Will had missed the point of education. It’s about more than just acquiring knowledge through books (or online lectures). While I commend Yale for putting these “resources” online – they are just that – resources and are not an education.

References:
Open Yale courses, (2011). Retrieved from: http://oyc.yale.edu/

Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2009). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education (4th ed.) Boston, MA: Pearson.